The politics within the framework of the British Secularism is very complex, pragmatist, and Machiavellian. It does everything to avoid responsibility. A Secularist government operates more secretly than overtly. It has developed all the political techniques that yield the best political result in a way that minimizes responsibility. The goal of the British Secularism is to never take the blame for anything as well as secular governments should never be identified as ‘enemies,’ so their political operations should be as covert as possible.

In this regard, a Secular government should never attack an individual directly. Not only will this alert the target, but the operation might even alert other citizens, relatives or members of his community, so this could lead to social cohesion as well as the operation will either fail or it will be achieved at a much higher cost.

For example, when a Secular Government – which is an embodiment of the British Secularism, decides to target a citizen, arrest him for political reasons or oppress him, the operation might include a change of law, regulation or a policy, as if there is a general change while the target himself will always appear as if he is a detail – as if there is nothing political behind the attack.

The British Secularism is a master of concealing the political operations against citizens. It avoids at any cost the possibility of making heroes or creating social or political cohesion. The most important thing is that the target himself should be treated as a completely ordinary case. This way, the British appointed governments could have oppressed and arrested millions of Muslims and political opponents.

The point which I am trying to make is that a British Secularist government could organize a fairly big operation to target or attack one individual – so the target is presented as an ordinary case, let alone when it comes to a whole community.

Is it possible that all this political campaign of introducing new genders, new laws, new definitions of gender and sex and marriage, and a new definition of human rights will actually end up as a classical war on Muslims, their families, and Islam?

Absolutely, it is quite possible that an attack on Islam and Muslims might appear as a general change on policies and the stance on human rights, it might appear as a general attack on the institution of family, but in reality it might have one target only: Islam and Muslims.

This insanity of gender experimentation, which includes the involvement of many actors, spies, and agents, could have one simple target: Muslim families and Islam, but they will never say this directly because it makes Muslims be aware of the war, so they will defend themselves. On the contrary, the western regimes act as if Muslims are not even on the radar. Indeed, this is a typical Secularist strategy.

Sabri Lushi

The post BRITISH SECULARISM’S POLITICAL AGENDAS ON GENDER AND SEX: A WAR AGAINST ISLAM?! appeared first on Kukes Post.

Dr. Bart Ehrman is a renowned American biblical scholar and the author of many books related to the historicity of Christianity and textual criticism of the New Testament. He is also very well known for his scholarly debates on topics related to his field of expertise. I’ve personally watched many of his debates and YouTube videos, and it is fair to say that Dr. Erhman is very articulate.

However, his view on God and religion is very disappointing, especially given his scholarly background and his intellectual integrity. He is a declared atheist or agnostic.

Dr. Bart Ehrman says that he used to be a Christian. The reason why he abandoned religion, more precisely, the faith in the existence of God, as he explains, is his problem with evil and suffering. He is not the first one to say this. The American science communicator and astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson justifies his atheistic views by not being able to reconcile between the idea that God is good, on one hand, and all the suffering that exists in the world, on the other hand.

Although this is very a foolish and silly argument, in my view, Dr. Bart Ehrman and Neil deGrasse Tyson are not stupid, at least intellectually, while according to the Qur’an, “who would reject the religion of Abraham except a fool!” [2:130]

Dr. Ehrman argues that there cannot be a God because there is much starvation, suffering – many small children dying every day, and injustice. To him, this does not make any sense. In fact, he goes even further that if there is such a God, he would refuse to accept Him exactly because His wisdom cannot be comprehended by Bart Ehrman.

Well, I totally agree with Bart Ehrman and Mr. Tyson that there is suffering, corruption, injustice and starvation. Young children die everyday, especially in Yemen, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Somalia etc. If there is a God, doesn’t He have the power to change the condition of those people?!

As a scholar, Bart Ehrman knows very well that human beings have free will. God has given them a special quality: free will. God has put humans in charge here on Earth as a test.

So, the starvation, injustice and corruption are caused by humans, not God. It’s not God responsible for the injustice, but us. I am shocked that Dr. Bart Ehrman fails to point the finger at the US Government and other criminal Western organizations for all the theft of natural resources and oil, wars and the murder of children in Iraq, dropping of bombs, rape and oppression, destruction of families and spread of corruption, but he finds it very convenient to blame God.

No, Dr. Bart, it is not God responsible for the massive starvation, but your corrupt and immoral government. So, blame the US Government, not God, Who has given us power and reason to test us how we act. Your government has chosen to kill and murder, to steal and destroy.

You’re very smart, Dr. Bart, but politically dishonest.

Sabri Lushi

The post DR. BART EHRMAN’S PROBLEM WITH GOD AND HIS POLITICAL DISHONESTY  appeared first on Kukes Post.

In this world, we believe that there are some natural laws that govern the natural activity and processes, as they are strongly identifiable facts, such as gravity, electromagnetic field, photosynthesis etc. Likewise, political power works on some principles and identifiable facts and processes.

Logically and observably, we can say that political power is a necessity, it is held and operated by humans, the political responsibility always goes back to one individual, and it needs an ideology or a set of beliefs, such as a religion, which is used as the general basis for the making of laws.

The political power could stem from the general desire or greed for property, money, fame, or from a more specific desire to rule and be on top of the others, which, nonetheless, represents a collective instinct and intrinsic need that someone has to lead. In a way, it is a natural and instinctive need, even if people are not able to articulate it by words.

The British Secularism seems to break the rule for the first time in history, or at least it appears as such, but if we analyze it carefully, we will notice that it contains all the classical elements or components of power.

First, the reason why I say ‘British Secularism’ is because this ideology is not universal, as it deceptively presents itself. Rather, it is a political ideology which has been adopted, used and utilized by the British Empire, especially when it started to spread its power globally. So, the British Secularism gives the impression that it represents a global political movement while it is simply the political face of the British Empire.

Second, the British Secularism gives the impression that it is a political system where power does not revolve around people, but it is embedded in abstract institutions, such as the office of the president, the judiciary, the people, the constitution etc. This is the biggest lie of history, a deception that continues to create havoc in the world. While clearly there are concrete people in power, such as the British Monarchy and its appointed minor monarchs, presidents and prime ministers around the world, they claim that it is the institutions which rule us – desks, walls, chairs, pieces of paper, so no concrete individual is responsible for political decisions, crimes, destruction and immorality.

We understand that it is very convenient for the British Empire to hide behind walls, pieces of papers and desks because this way it protects its power and it absolves itself from political responsibility and it protects itself from retribution, but this is just a deception. That’s why there’s so much noise, propaganda, rhetoric, lies, and fake political activity – such as elections, in order to cover up the original lie, that it is the institutions which rule us, not people, as it is the case classically, as well as to cover up the fact that the British Secularism is supposedly a neutral ideology – which is not.

Sabri Lushi

The post IS THE BRITISH SECULARISM A DECEPTION? appeared first on Kukes Post.

The British Secularism is not a genuine philosophical ideology which intends to present to the world and its problems a real alternative and solution. It doesn’t have a sincere concern about humanity and the direction it is heading to. Its objective is not to honestly attempt to address issues and answer fundamental questions.

For example, the British Secularism is not concerned about the ultimate effects of policies, social behaviors, the survival of humanity, what’s right and what’s wrong, the natural justice, and moral principles. Instead, it stands on some poorly defined and abusive principles, such as freedom, utilitarianism, hedonism and liberalism, each of which sounds good but they are just propaganda and empty slogans.

In essence, the British Secularism has one major political objective: control and only control. It has been historically the official political ideology of the British Empire and it continues to dominate the world to this very day, as the Evil Empire has managed to rule the entire globe, unfortunately.

It seems that the British Empire has come up with a very effective system of control. It seems it has mastered the art of political control. In my view, if there is one sector which the British Empire has invested the most, that is the political control of people. When it comes to control, the British Secularism is state-of-the-art. So, the whole political activity of the British Secularism revolves around the control of people, especially given the fact that it rules the entire world and the largest number of people ever walked on Earth.

The purpose of the Secularist laws is not primarily to protect people’s lives and properties, their dignity, families, reputation, and health – including mental health, but to control them, even in the cases when one of such categories is cited.

In addition, the workplaces and labor laws have been designed to serve one purpose: the control of people, by keeping them busy, by having access to them, by intimidating and threatening and harassing them.

The British Secularism uses the school system and the media, too, for the same purpose: to control people through brain washing, and by keeping them busy for years, and by wasting their time and money.

Most importantly, under the British Secularism, all people should be informal and secret servants of the state, who should be ready to act in the name of the government without questioning the morality of orders. Under Secularism, there is no ‘them vs. us,” but all against all. People are like robots, trained to cancel the faculty of consciousness, who are controlled by the government, and the result is amazing: all against all while the British Empire continues to rule strongly and undisturbed.

Sabri Lushi

The post THE BRITISH SECULARISM’S KEY TO POWER: ALL AGAINST ALL appeared first on Kukes Post.