CanadaEnglish

A Letter to the Prime Minister of Canada

by Kukes Post
written by Kukes Post

A Letter to the Prime Minister of Canada

Mark Carney

Pierre Poilievre

Danielle Smith

________________________________________

October 16, 2026

 

THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA USES EMPLOYERS AS INTERMEDIARIES AND AGENTS FOR POLITICAL PERSECUTION

 

 

 

Dear Prime Minister Mark Carney,

 

 

 

Cc: Danielle Smith, the Premier of Alberta

 

Pierre Poilievre, the Leader of the Official Opposition

 

Tony Xu, CEO of Doordash, Inc.

 

 

 

 

When the British Empire was on the rise, appearing as a serious contender in the global arena in the 19th century, especially against the Ottoman Empire – the last Muslim caliphate, it brought to the world a new political and economic system, that is, the concentration of power in the hands of the Government, or the British Royals for that matter, in the hope that this could be a force for change, by overlooking or diminishing the power that individuals enjoy, especially their direct access to natural resources.

 

Without going into a full overview of the pros and cons of the British communist system, it can be summarized as follows: people are expected to give up their land ownership, their tribal connections, their private businesses and enterprises, and by and large their agricultural individualistic economic system and delegate the entire power to the Government. Unwillingly, because of the propaganda, or perhaps due to the military conquest of the British Empire, we are in a situation where we own nothing except our ability to work in governmentally owned corporations.

 

Dear Prime Minister of Canada, we do not own land, nor does the economy facilitate for us a direct access to natural resources. We own only skills in the job market, which, under the British Secularist System, is heavily controlled by the Gvoernment. Our job is our land, our income, our tribe, and our business. Attacking our jobs means a direct attack on our income, which by extension means an existential threat.

 

As a reminder, because people in power like you often overlook or forget, the right to live and have access to natural resources is a natural God-given right; it is not a favor bestowed upon us by the Government, the Secularist ruling elite, or by King Charles III and his family.

 

I am starting my letter to you with this harsh and blunt language because the tyranny and despotism of people like you, I mean, British Secularists around the world who are currently in power globally, is crossing every red line, especially when it comes to Muslims.

 

 

***

 

I am Sabri Lushi, a resident of Edmonton, AB, Canada, and a Muslim. The reason why I am choosing to underline this identification is due to the declared war of the American Terrorist Regime against the religion of Islam and the Muslim Ummah at the behest of the British Communist Empire. Clearly, we Muslims are under attack by British Secularists, without excluding Muslims who live in the Muslim world, but ruled by British and American spies and agents. Therefore, any attack or persecution committed by the Government of Canada in cooperation with employers I place it in the context of this British-American war against Islam and Muslims.

 

Dear Prime Minister, as an individual, the only weapon which I posses is my pen; therefore, I am resorting to it in order to defend myself, my income, and also to use any confrontation with the Government as a means to point out to broader acts of injustice that are inflicted upon other Muslim brothers and sisters around the world by US and British terrorist agents who are in power.

 

Yesterday, October 15, 2026, the delivery company which I work for, namely, DoorDash, Inc., stole an amount of money from me. I filed a complaint, I contacted its customer support, and even I contacted via email its CEO Tony Xu, but, in the most provocative way, they refused to reimburse my money here in this country where you rule.

 

The amount was a little more than what I make in one day, but the flagrant violation that it committed is what worries me. This is not the first time that this company abuses its power and steals from its hired drivers, including tips, as well as this is not the first employer to abuse. The problems that I faced before with the Municipality of Edmonton, for example, were of a much greater magnitude, indicating consistently the governmental persecution through employers.

 

The reason why I am contacting you directly – a letter which I will make public, too, is to address a more serious problem which I’ve encountered multiple times in Canada over the last decade since I landed here in 2015.

 

The problem is, from my perspective, that the Government of Canada, in cooperation with its spy agencies, uses employers in order to oppress the Canadian citizens, threaten them, abuse them financially, and even persecute them for political and religious purposes. It uses employers to threaten the income of whoever speaks the truth, especially Muslim immigrants like myself.

 

Clearly, the Government of Canada enjoys an absolute level of control – it controls all employers and all avenues of income; however, this is not the public contract of the Government with its subjects; at least, your political system claims that it has chosen to abstain from the use of the classical forms of political persecution and economic coercion. I have been under the impression that Canada is not identical with the many other terrorist communist regimes around the world which have been installed by the British Empire and the US Republic.

 

The sad reality is that the Government of Canada is a backstabbing Secularist regime, acting not much differently than other dictatorships and despotic regimes which oppress their own citizens. Nevertheless, I believe that the problem is ideological and intrinsic to the British Secularism itself; we are not dealing with the misguided actions of a certain prime minister or some abusive intelligence service officers who work as CEOs or corporate staff.

 

It seems that the British Secularism – the official ideology of the British Communist Empire, is an evil and oppressive political system. It has no regard for human dignity. It cannot tolerate ideas, thoughts, opinions, and a competitive political environment. Rather, it believes in oppression, betrayal, concentration of power, and human enslavement.

 

***

 

The reason why I keep brining up this mentioning of the British Secularism is my great disappointment that I have with this ideology, realizing how much harm it has brought to the world and it continues to create havoc.

 

More than a century ago, many Muslim agents and spies, Arab and non-Arab, cooperated with the British Communist Empire against the Ottoman Empire. They were a major factor for the defeat of the last Muslim caliphate. Many of them perhaps joined the British communists not only for money as traitors, but they also believed that the British Secularism has something to offer to the world – the respect for work. More or less, I used to believe the same prior to immigrating to the West, not knowing that the West is the head of the snake itself when it comes to political persecution and despotism.

 

As a Muslim, today I can see how wrong they were, how foolishly and naïvely such Muslim spies and agents acted when they rose against their own caliphate. They fell for the British lies and deception. They somehow assumed that those western pagans who have no religion and no belief in God could have figured out a better economic system, as if doubting Islam itself.

 

We tried Secularism. We tried man-made British laws. We tried the American model of republic. We tried the British-American communism. We tried the British model of power concentration.

 

They were wrong. The reality has proven the British Secularism to be a fraud, devilish, and an immoral ideology and political system. We are witnessing each and every day what Secularists are doing to the world – fighting and inciting wars, shedding the blood of innocent people, murdering children, sponsoring terrorism, stealing people’s money and property, tearing down social values, and giving rise to dictatorships and tyrannies.

 

Dear Prime Minister Mark Carney, let me remind you of the latest crimes of the British-American Secularists; they destroyed Iraq where they murdered hundreds of thousands innocent citizens; they have murdered thousands of children in Gaza; they destroyed Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan, Bosnia etc.

 

Even in those cases when Secularists were Muslim, what they did was horrible. Look at the Middle Eastern tyrannies – the same spies and agents who cooperated with the British Empire, who were put in power after the fall of the Ottoman Empire as British viceroys are oppressing their own people because this is the true nature of British Secularists.

 

***

 

I conclude this letter by emphasizing again the fact that the Government of Canada violates the most important rights of people: the right to work – to have access to natural resources. Your government abuses its power; it uses employers, such as DoorDash, Inc. or the Municipality of the City of Edmonton, in order to persecute and threaten the income of Canadian citizens – those who pay taxes.

 

Certainly, this is not an isolated case. This is the true nature of Secularists: they lie, deceive, oppress, and betray. There is no other ideology or group of people who has betrayed the world more than what British Secularists have done; they’ve fooled millions of people to give up their land ownership and their traditional and sustainable economic life style and trust Secularists. When they grabbed the entire political power in a global scale, Secularists showed their true face.

 

Dear Prime Minister, this is not a complaint, for your Government and King Charles III have caused me a greater harm than a couple of hundred dollars stolen by Doordash provocatively; this is merely an attempt to use any weapon at my disposal, i.e., the pen, in order to raise awareness against the deception of the British Communist Secularism – this evil ideology that is destroying the world, given the fact that many, many Muslims continue to immigrate to this country, making the same mistake over and over again because those who speak the truth are silenced by British and American despots around the world. Your immoral government is trying to silence me, too, but at least I don’t give up because our battle against the British-American tyranny is an existential battle. The more Muslims understand this, the better is the chance to defend ourselves as a community from the oppression of Godless people, i.e., Secularists.

 

Attacking the income of people and using employers as spies for political reasons is an atrocious and flagrant manifestation of political betrayal and breach of trust.

 

 

 

Sabri Lushi

 

_____________________________________________________________________

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Islam

HOXHALLARËT DHE QASJA JO E DUHUR NDAJ TË ASHTUQUAJTURIT SHPOPULLIM TË SHQIPËRISË

by Kukes Post
written by Kukes Post

HOXHALLARËT DHE QASJA JO E DUHUR NDAJ TË ASHTUQUAJTURIT SHPOPULLIM TË SHQIPËRISË

Përveç intelektualëve e zërave publikë shqiptarë, edhe hoxhallarët e klerikët musilmanë po reagojnë në lidhje me fenomenin tashmë të njohur si ‘shpopullim i Shqipërisë.’ Sipas statistikave zyrtare, shqiptarët janë ndër popujt me përqindje emigrimi më të lartë në botë, duke u barazuar me disa nga vendet që kanë qenë në luftë për dekada të tëra, siç është rasti i Libanit. Pra, të gjithë biem dakord se shpopullimi është një shqetësim real dhe i prekshëm.

Në radhë të parë, fakti që hoxhallarët me të drejtë e kanë ngritur këtë shqetësim nëpër minberet e xhamive, kjo tregon, për mendimin tim, se shpopullimi është i drejtuar më shumë ndaj muslimanëve. Ky fenomen nuk është i vërtetë vetëm në Shqipëri, Kosovë, Bosnje, apo Maqedoni e Veriut – aty ku jetojnë muslimanët autoktonë të Europës, por shkatërrimi i vendeve muslimane përmes luftërave amerikano-britanike, prishja e ekonomive të vendeve të tyre, embargot, e deri tek nxitja e muslimanëve që të braktisin vendet e tyre e të emigrojnë në Perëndim është një e vërtetë empirikisht e verifikueshme.

Me fjalët të tjera, shpopullimi, emigrimit, apo dislokimi i popullsisë është një strategji lufte parësisht kundër ummetit islam, por kjo nuk përjashton edhe etnicitetet apo popullsitë e feve të tjera.

Sa i përket trajtimit politik apo intelektual të kësaj lufte të heshtur demografike që ka karakter global, jo vetëm ndaj populli të caktuar, qasja ndaj saj nga pikëpamja kombëtare, patriotike, apo nacionaliste është e gabuar për mendimin tim. Kjo është pika që mendoj se hoxhallarët po artikulohen jo siç duhet pavarësisht dëshirës së tyre të mirë, dhe këtë nuk e vëmë në diskutim.

Qytetari i thjeshtë nuk është nacionalisht; qytetari i zakonshëm është pragmatist, kërkon të punojë, të mbajë familjen, të investojë për të ardhmen, dhe t’i bëjë vend vetes që të kalojë një pleqëri të rehatshme nëse Zoti i jep jetë. Ashtu siç thotë një proverb latine, ‘aty ku është mirë, është vendlindja.’

Popullit të thjeshtë nuk i intereson shumë çështja kombëtare, se po ngelen viset tona bosh, se po zëvendësohen me etnicitete të tjera, apo se po zhduket gjuha e kultura shqiptare. Këto nuk kanë asnjë kuptim për shqiptarin e zakonshëm. Madje kjo tregon se patriotizmi e nacionalizmi janë propagandë politike e strategji shtetërore që populli në fund të ditës i percepton si gjëra boshe, që nuk mund t’ua shtrosh fëmijëve në darkë në tavolinë për të ngrënë.

Ajo çfarë i intereson një babai, një nëne, apo një të riu që kërkon të ndërtojë jetën është niveli i jetesës apo jetueshmëria. Për ta, vendlindja e vërtetë është aty ku ka punë, siguri, ligje të drejta, të ardhme për fëmijët, mertesë të shëndoshë, sistem shëndetësie të mirë e të përballueshëm, ku ka moral, jetë sociale, dhe dobishmëri. Në këtë dimension operon qytetari i thjeshtë, e jo me parulla politike, siç është nacionalizmi, që sa po t’i prishet interesi vetjak e hedh në kosh të plehrave.

Ajo çfarë hoxhallarët duhet t’ua bëjnë me dije popullit të thjeshtë apo muslimanëve është e vërteta e hidhur e Perëndimit. Njerëzit duhet të sqarohen se Perëndimi nuk është ai që reklamohet në Shqipëri, duhet t’u bëhet me dije se Amerika është mashtrimi më i madh që i është shitur botës, dhe se në Britani të Madhe e Kanada nuk ka një të ardhme për fëmijët e tyre. Pikërisht, ato gjëra për të cilat shqiptari braktis vendlindjen e tij nuk do t’i gjejë në Europë e as në Amerikë, as punën, as një jetësë më të mirë, e as një të ardhme më të garantuar sepse Perëndimi është i rrënuar.

Vërtetë në Shqipëri ka vështirësira ekonomike e politike, por vendlindja të jep atë që Perëndimi nuk ta jep; në vendlindje njeriu ka reputacionin, shoqërinë, njeh kulturën, gjuhën, dhe mbi të gjitha është qytetar legjitim – ‘guri i rëndi në vendin e tij,’ thotë populli.

Këtë duhet të vënë në duke hoxhallarët bashkë me intelektualët apo zërat publikë në përgjithësi, se të braktisësh vendin tënd e të emigrosh në Perëndim është vendim i gabuar nga pikëpamja personale, qoftë nga ana ekonomike, familjare, morale, e madje edhe në aspektin e shërbimeve shëndetësore.

Kur qytetari i thjeshtë merr vendimin për ta lënë vendin e tij e për t’u larguar në Amerikë apo Europën Perëndimore, ai vendos në peshore gjërat që i interesojnë, e jo nacionalizmin apo patriotizmin. Nëse Perëndimi më garanton një jetë më të mirë, Shqipërisë t’i vihet flaka – do të argumentonte në veten e tij njeriu i zakonshëm pragmatist.

Përkundrazi, nëse atij do t’i sqarohet e vërteta se Perëndimi nuk të garanton një jetë më të mirë se Shqipëria, atëherë secili nga ne do ta mendonte një qind herë përpara se të vendoste që të merrte rrugën e emigrimit të vështirë.

Qytetari niset nga interesi personal, e jo nga ai kombëtar. Për këtë arsye, njerëzit kanë nevojë të dinë të vërtetën e emigrimit, të vërtetën e politikave djallëzore amerikano-britanike për kontrollin e botës, për faktin se bota drejtohet nga një Qeveri Globale, që, nëse ke probleme politike e ekonomike në Shqipëri, ato probleme do t’i gjesh kudo që të shkosh në botë, se qytetërimi njerëzor ka hyrë në një epokë unike kur teknologjia po e nxjerr njeriun jashtë loje, gjë që e bën punësimin shumë të vështirë.

Vendlindja, nga ana tjetër, të ofron disa gjëra që në vetvete nuk perceptohen si benefite, por që janë aty e përfiton prej tyre. Njeriu nuk e ka peshën politike askund më të rëndë se në vendin e tij. Aty ku ke lindur, ku flet gjuhën, njeh shoqërinë, ke bërë një emër, dhe ke farefisin, aty është shumë më e lehtë për ta ndërtaur të ardhmen se sa në një vend të huaj ku nuk ke asnjë peshë politike.

Nëse shpopullohet Shqipëria apo jo, ky është sllogan politik i pavlerë për qytetarin e thjeshtë që kërkon të vendosë ushqim në tavoni për fëmijët e tij në darkë, të paguajë faturat mujore, dhe të ketë një strehë. Nëse Perëndimi garanton një jetë më të mirë, patriotizmi nuk e pengon njeriun për të mos rendur pas saj.

Por, Perëndimi nuk të ofron një jetë më të mirë. Perëndimi është mashtrim, nuk të garanton të ardhme, as familje, as punë, as shërbime shëndetësore të përballueshme, e as një pleqëri dinjitoze. Perëndimi është i rrënuar, i degjeneruar, i korruptuar, ku me miliona njerëz – njerëz si puna jonë – flenë rrugëve si endacakë, sepse nuk kanë punë, nuk kanë familje, nuk kanë një shtëpi sepse atë e ka marrë banka për shkak të borxheve, që kanë përfunduar në një gjendjej të dëshpëruar, të alkolizuar, e të droguar – një tragjedi e vërtetë, që po ta dinte mirë shqiptari i thjeshtë, jo vetëm që nuk do ta linte vendin e tij, por do të bëhej optimist për ta ndërtuar të ardhmen e tij në vendilindje, sidomos në një vend si Shqipëria.



Sabri Lushi

Gusht 2026

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
EnglishPoliticsUSA

THE US PRESIDENT, PROPOGANDA, AND THE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF COMMUNISM

by Kukes Post
written by Kukes Post

THE US PRESIDENT, PROPOGANDA, AND THE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF COMMUNISM

As a Muslim, watching the US President and other officials of the US Government attempting to associate communism with Muslims, I feel compelled to react against it. As they say, the best defense is a good offense; this is precisely what the US President is doing.

What is communism?

Different from what historians and political critics try to define it, communism stands on two major principles or objectives: first, to strip people off any form of power, be it political, economic, religious, social or tribal, and second, to disguise the political power itself by replacing concrete people with virtual and abstract concepts.

Historians assert and maintain the official version, that a man called Karl Marx (1818-1883), who started his modest career as an activist journalist in the Kingdom of Prussia (Germany), looked at the economic inequality growing exponentially with the development of technology, or what is called ‘industrial revolution.’ As a philosopher and social critic who he became meanwhile, especially influenced by figures such as the German philosopher Hegel, Marx studied carefully the economic condition of Germany, France, and Great Britain of that time from both a theoretical and critical point of view. As a result, he formulated and articulated his political ideas in his two major works, The Communist Manifesto (1848) co-authored with Friedrich Engels, and Das Kapital (1867–1894).

The influential position of Karl Marx is not to be underestimated, but to believe that an independent man, singlehandedly, who had no political power, not being part of a royal family, somehow managed to become so politically influential in a time when the media was under the full control of the state, and his ideas somehow were adopted by governments and political activists of the 19th and the 20th centuries, by turning communism into a major political model of the world, all of this is farfetched unless we look into the political landscape of the world of the last three centuries more comprehensively, wholesomely, and critically.

At best, we can say that Karl Marx was commissioned by the political power of that time, that is, the British Empire of the Victorian Era, to formulate a political theory which was already in application, but with the intention to spread it around the world as the British power was on the rise and aspiring to bring down the Ottoman Empire. In other words, the British Empire must have understood that the concealment of power, hiding behind the name of Marx, makes it more acceptable by other nations.

If we look at the political evolution of the British Empire, there is one major milestone that cannot be disregarded. That turning point is called America. Not only did it give the British Empire access to new natural resources and trading routes, but also the new continent served as a political workshop or laboratory, if we may call it so, in order to experiment politically, to come up with a new model much required for an empire to rule the world.

The new political model was called republic. While the name was reminiscent of the old Roman Empire, which indicates the global ambition of the British Empire, this prototypical political entity was, in my view, unprecedented, bizarre, and uncommon. It was the birth of communism, which became a reality with the formation of the US Republic.

The Republic of the United States of America was founded in 1776 after the British Empire conquered the New France – the vast French autonomous territories of the French Empire in North America. In other words, the USA was the celebration of the British Empire’s victory over the French Empire – which was about to fall in one or two decades.

Coming together under one federal government, the 13 British colonies gave rise to a political entity, that is, the USA, which had two major objectives: to strip people off power, and to disguise the political power itself – mainly to disassociate the British king from perhaps the dirty work and crimes of the American- British brutality and economic exploitation of the New World, as well as to bring about a new ruling model convenient and suitable for an empire which was growing global.

To reiterate, the USA is the first political creature in human history to disguise the political power protrusively and blatantly. The system is designed to be confusing for the laymen, concrete proprietors and holders of power are replaced with abstract entities, such as institutions, offices, and ‘the people,’ and the power itself is distributed among the three branches of the government and other local governments to the extent that it is hard for the lay citizen to keep tract of political responsibility, spot concrete names who commit political injustice, and determine who is directly responsible for political decisions which affect his or her life.

In addition, republic provides the perfect discreet political enterprise for making laws. If under a classical kingdom laws and decrees were a clear demonstration of power, embodying the authority of the leader, under the American Republic, on the other hand, the important process of law-making turned into routine, intangible, and downplaying process. Strictly speaking, the modern state has managed to camouflage the most important part of power, that is, the law-making, as a routine process which escapes the attention of the public. This is perhaps the most striking form of power concealment of the American communism.

Thus, we don’t exactly know who rules America, where the chain of command ends, who is above who, who is the final authority, how laws are made, who is the highest authority to settle a potential political dispute which could turn the whole political system into a stalemate, who controls the political parties, what is the process of political recruitment and career, who supervises it, who controls the economy, who appoints judges etc. These are not supposed to be such difficult questions, as it is the case with the new modern state. However, the purpose is to disguise the political power. It has nothing to do with the idea of providing a better and fairer political system, as they call it ‘democracy.’

The other objective of the US Republic was to gradually strip people off power and turn them into vulnerable citizens, easily controlled by the ruling power. This process includes the confiscation of land by the Government, the massive taxation of businesses and properties and personal income, the formation of corporations and monopolies, the elimination of functional small businesses, the destruction of family, the control of agriculture and food supply, allowing the Government to hold the right to regulate the concept of family and impose family laws which lack any natural or religious redline, and grant the society negative and destructive forms of freedom, such as drugs, unregulated sex, promiscuity, and gambling which intend to give rise to a weak society.

This is American, and this is exactly communism.

To conclude, under the American system, political power in concealed. The mechanism of power lacks common explanation while clarity is a prerequisite for a fair political system. The American political system is not clear. In addition, the American Government has established a system where the society consists of vulnerable individuals, weak, where most of the wealth of the country is owned by a handful of people who present themselves as ‘private,’ but who are part of the ruling elite, where the concept of family has been transformed completely, legally and socially, in order to eliminate any from of tribal and kinship power.

In America, all forms of power have been delegated to the Government, be it legal power, political, economic, decision-making, family, or military while the American society is a conglomerate of weak individuals, powerless, who own nothing, many of them are tribeless immigrants, others born in a situation who don’t even know who the father is, or sometimes none of the parents, where sex has been turned into a disastrous and non-family building activity in order to render people feeble, accessible, and defenseless, and where marriage and family have been transformed by the Government into destructive mechanisms.

This is the description of communism, and this is America, standing on two legs: the concealment of political power, and a society consisting of powerless, yet politically obedient and easily controlled individuals. The average American citizen lives paycheck to paycheck, doesn’t own a home, has no family, commonly divorced, many of them one step ahead of homelessness, parents who live in senior housing, children born out of wedlock or adopted by random people, while the corporations control the market and food supply. The average American citizen is a worker, not a business owner. In this regard, the US Constitution is de facto the first communist manifesto.

The average American citizen has no political power, no tribe or family to confront any governmental injustice, no property to live independently, and no economic leverage to fend off the governmental despotism or the American judicial tyranny.

A famous proverb goes, ‘every accusation is a confession.’ By trying to accuse Muslims as communists, the US President is actually making a confession, that America is a communist country, not because this is a secrete, but the American propaganda has managed to cover up the very truth of the political foundation of the USA, i.e., communism, to the extent that it has been able to distance itself completely from it.

As for the religion of Islam, it is the opposite of the American communism: it promotes clarity, part of which is tangible political responsibility, and it empowers the individuals with real property rights and strong family while a Muslim government lacks legislative power.



Sabri Lushi

August 13, 2026

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
EnglishOpinion

IMMIGRATION, THE CORRUPT WEST, AND AI:  THE GLOBAL AGENDA COULD BACKFIRE

by Kukes Post
written by Kukes Post

IMMIGRATION, THE CORRUPT WEST, AND AI:  THE GLOBAL AGENDA COULD BACKFIRE

Despite the propaganda of the corrupt countries such as the USA, the UK, or Canada, I don’t think people, especially Muslims, have immigrated to the West out of love for their fake democracy, their life style, or even much less for their so-called freedom. The reason was purely economical, but that’s about to change.

Over the last one or two centuries, the American-British occupation of the world, more particularly that of the Muslim Ummah, deprived a large portion of the global population from affording a good living in their homeland, not to mention the devastating American wars which forced millions of Muslims to abandon their homes. As a result, millions of people immigrated to Canada, the UK, the USA, and other western countries looking for a better living, for a job, or for a safe haven, not because they loved the American constitution, not because they had a special regard for the Canadian or British anti-family laws, or for their falling apart slaved societies. Again, the reasons were economical and safety related.

However, the West did something which decades ago was unimaginable; it developed a technology and artificial intelligence which are about to replace the role of humans completely. From machine operation, to janitorial services and maintenance, of all sectors of the economy, governmental administration, transportation, construction, healthcare, military, domestic safety and security, or the production of goods and services in general, human labor and analytic role of humans are fully replaceable. This is a big and unprecedented change.

Canada, the UK, or the USA no longer offer jobs for immigrants.  If in the past the western communism was enforced by the Government, now it is an economic imposed reality. As controversial as it might seem, it is unfortunately a reality. Western countries have operated as massive slave societies, but at least an average Canadian citizen, an American, or indeed a British immigrant could afford a decent living standard, could buy a home, and many of them even used to invest back home.

Being an obedient slave, working hard, being able to hold one or two jobs, sleeping in the truck as a dedicated long-haul driver, shipping goods from coast to coast or from Mexico to the USA or Canada, maintaining railways or continental highways, or graduating from western universities do not guarantee jobs anymore. The economy has changed fundamentally.

The economy does not need slaves anymore. Instead, the majority of us will be forced to live under despotic governments which are heavily armed and equipped with abusive laws and cruel law-enforcement forces, under the mercy of the western communist governments, with absolutely controlled and limited incomes while the dignity of living will be below that of a classical slave.

Under such miserable conditions, people will react. They will search for freedom, dignity, and optimal living conditions, where they can practice their religion and raise a family – things which the West will not grant anymore, not even symbolically. Therefore, it is not farfetched to believe that a considerable portion of the global population, especially Muslims, will abandon the West altogether, geographically, culturally, politically, and economically because it no longer satisfies people’s needs.

Millions will escape to mountains and remote areas, as farther as possible from the West, from the western lifestyle, from the American enslaving constitution, from the Canadian abusive laws, from the media, from governmental corrupt schools, from the British tyrannical monarchy, in search of a better living, looking for freedom in order to live as free humans.

The world is about to enter into a great battle, not between countries, but because two living styles: those who want to live under the oppression of the government with no rights, as slaves, worshipping human unjust gods, and those who value freedom and want to worship God the Just. The battle is inevitable because the economic changes are urging it.

In this regard, the evil agenda of the American-British Global Government to turn the entire world into a large concentration camp, where governmental control is exercised at the highest level possible, could backfire. The plan could fail. The very mechanisms, i.e., technology and AI, which they invented in order to control people could trigger the opposite effect.

If people immigrated to the USA or the West in general, not because they loved their laws, but for a job, America, Canada, the UK etc. no longer offer jobs. As a result, people will reject the West. A new trend will start: abandonment of modernity and return to the religious roots which offer a solution, comfort, and ideological tools to start an affordable and free life and a new civilization. That’s exactly what will happen.

I think the West is fully aware of this reaction; therefore, it has started a massive, yet covert, campaign of forcing people to abandon their homeland. Despite the high level of unemployment in the western countries, immigration is on the rise, not because America and Canada need more workers, but it is part of the global agenda to dislocate people, to put them in areas where they can be easily controlled in the future, and to prevent them from escaping the draconic governmental control which will be unavoidable in the near future.

In short, America is not building a wall in the south; quite the contrary, covertly it is forcing massive immigration, as well as Canada is not offering a safe haven to people, but carrying out the evil agendas of the American-British Global Government. For better or for worse, technology will trigger a major inevitable battle between the oppressive and communist West and the Muslim Ummah searching for freedom. In my view, the outcome of this battle depends on which group acts more strategically, swiftly, and deserves God’s help. Nevertheless, the future will be very challenging.



Sabri Lushi

August 11, 2026

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
EnglishIslam

THE POLITICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WISDOM BEHIND THE MARRIAGE BETWEEN THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD (ﷺ) AND THE YOUNG A’ISHA

by Kukes Post
written by Kukes Post

THE POLITICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WISDOM BEHIND THE MARRIAGE BETWEEN THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD (ﷺ) AND THE YOUNG A’ISHA

The greatest man to have ever walked on the planet earth, the most mature one, equipped with the most sound and perfect intellect, and a leader of the highest form is often accused to have consumed a marriage which seems to contradict the above-mentioned qualities, that it, his marriage to the young daughter of Abu Bakar, that is, A’isha (God be pleased with both of them).

What makes this issue even more misunderstood and misleading is the apologetic approach of many Muslims, including so-called scholars and intellectuals, by trying to reinterpret the biographic narrations, or attempting to classify them as non-authentic, or even those who accept them, but, by trying to justify this fact with a culture context, indirectly admitting as something not to feel proud of, let alone for a man who was appointed by God as the greatest prophet of all time, the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ).

I could point out two prerequisites for understanding the wisdom behind this particular marriage of the greatest prophet. First, he (ﷺ) has the highest standard of morality, so it is not satisfiable to test his lifestyle against a low-bar morality, such as ‘also others did this’ – there must be more wisdom is that than the culture itself, and second, one of the most important roles of a prophet is to liberate people from human oppression, as Allah summarizes in the Qur’an the mission of Moses, for example, “go to Pharaoh, for he has transgressed.” [Suran an-Nazi’at, 17].

Thus, the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) was sent by God to the entire humanity, not restricted to the Arab people, in order to liberate all humans from injustice, oppression, exploitation, and political tyranny, by reciting to them the Qur’an [the verbatim word of God], giving them instructions, living a role model as a prophet, as a free person, as a leader, husband, and father, teaching them the divine law and morality – all for one purpose: to liberate people from the oppression of other fellow humans to the light of God, which is known in the religious terminology as worshipping God.

The preoccupation of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) was to serve as a role model, to teach wisdom, to promote strength in the community of the believers, to teach them maturity, power, and to quip them with all the necessary means – ideological and psychological – in order to free themselves if oppressed, to resist, and be ready to cope with the difficulties of life where humans are after the enslavement of each other.

On the other hand, the American-British Secularism, for example, is a political system which manufactures a society easy to be controlled, exploited, and enslaved by the ruling elite. The average western citizen is a slave and a weak person. The purpose of Islam is exactly the opposite: strength, power, and maturity.

For example, in the West, people are taught that they are apparently evolved monkeys, that men and women are the same implying even biologically, that gender is a fluid trait – people can assume any gender they want, and that children mature at 18 years old. Besides, the western American-British culture or lifestyle is full of elements which induce and propagate weakness, lack of maturity, division, political submissiveness, and a slave mentality, such as in the way people talk, eat, drink, and behave in public. For instance, seeing a man in his sixties wearing shorts in public while licking his ice-cream is not the appearance of a mature and strong man who would be able to resist and protect his family from the Government, but the prospects of a slave.

The goal of the religion of Islam is to raise strong people, mature, who refuse slavery, and who live with dignity and free. Teaching the society to treat respectively girls and boys who have reached their puberty as mature women and men, this is the mindset of a free society, who promotes strength, contrary to the enslaving societies who teach people to appear as weak and immature.

The Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) got married to the nine-year-old A’isha, who had reached her puberty, to value her position, to treat her as woman, definitely knowing that evil agendas of the slave masters across human history are to render a society weak, a society of children who are grown up biologically, but not mentally and psychologically. Slave masters teach girls and boys to remain as such even when they grow up biologically, so they could be enslaved easily. This is not Islam; this is America and the West in general.

Likewise, the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) appointed the teenager Usama bin Zayd, arguably 16 years old, as an army commander to fight against Romans while senior companions of the Prophet (ﷺ) were part of his battalion. This is not the outlook of an oppressive and enslaving society consisting of submissive and weak members, but the product of the great teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) who built a free society, with mature men and women, who were ready to fight against oppression and whose teenagers were ready to lead armies, like Usama, who was one of the most beloved people to the Messenger of God, raised in his household.

To summarize, apart from its biological aspects, such as puberty, maturity is also a cultural mindset and a psychological manifestation taught to the members of the society. Free societies give rise to mature people while the oppressive and enslaving ones impose on people weakness, foolishness, and submissiveness, as it is the case in the West.

A’isha (رضي الله عنها) was treated as a woman when she reached her puberty, and she demonstrated to the world to be one of the most important and smartest women ever existed. She became a great scholar with high and strong intellectual capacity to give strong opinions among the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), and to even criticize or correct the views or legal opinions of other companions. Apart from that, she demonstrated a high level of maturity when she led a military expedition from Mecca to Basra (Iraq) in 656 CE (36 hijri) as an attempt to capture and execute those rebels who participated in the assassination of the caliph Uthman (may Allah be please with him).

To conclude, the marriage between the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) and A’isha (رضي الله عنها) was not simply a detail of the biography of the greatest prophet, about which we should try to give an apologetical context in order to justify it as if we should feel embarrassed. On the contrary, there is much wisdom behind this marriage between the greatest prophet and the famous daughter of a very important man, namely, Abu Bakar. This marriage was meant to be famous and vocal. The chastity and honor of A’isha was even mentioned in the Qur’an, so the details of this marriage constitute legislation as well as they embody precious wisdom.

We ourselves are direct witnesses of a society or a political system, as it is the case of the American-British Secularism, which imposes on people lack of maturity and weakness by convincing young people that they are still babies (even wearing diapers) even though they are biologically grown up. The result: oppression, exploitation, corruption, immorality, enslavement, division, and political tyranny.

While the western tyrants want to enslave people, the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) came to liberate us, to teach us strength, to teach women to act as women and men as men, not as babies who reach their 20s or 30s and they’re still not ready to show responsibility, to raise a family, or even to be able to protect themselves from human oppression.

A’isha is one of the most precious and valuable details of the biography of the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ). He did not get married to her out of lust or bad judgment. Never! The Messenger of God (ﷺ) is the most intellectually matured man of human race; therefore, he taught us how to be mature, strong, and ready to live a successful life while the West promotes slavery and political exploitation of people.

The Muslim scholars are unanimously in agreement that A’isha is the greatest female scholar and the smartest woman of human history. There is no doubt that her demonstrated intellectual, political, theological, and even military maturity and capacity were a result of the fact that she was treated as a woman at the right biological stage, so much so that she got married to the most mature man, that is, the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ).

In short, the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) did get married to a young lady, but treated someone who had reached her puberty as a mature woman. Her life proved that the decision was right: she became a strong and mature woman, who even had the power to lead armies, share her scholarly opinion, disagree, and enjoy the highest level of respect and scholarly reverence among Muslims.



Sabri Lushi

August 10, 2026

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
EnglishOpinion

IN THE AGE OF THE AI: IT IS NOT WISE TO IMMIGRATE TO THE WEST, ESPECIALLY FOR MUSLIMS

by Kukes Post
written by Kukes Post

IN THE AGE OF THE AI: IT IS NOT WISE TO IMMIGRATE TO THE WEST, ESPECIALLY FOR MUSLIMS

Artificial intelligence is changing the economical, social, and political structure of the society in an unprecedented manner. The role of the government and our relation to it will change fundamentally because of one simple fact: our role as humans with regard to work is being replaced by technology. While this will give a huge apparent advantage to the government or those who currently control politics and the capital, for the vast majority of people who have nothing to offer except their professional skills and muscles as means to earn income, it is time to be wise, think carefully about the future, and reflect deeply on the economic transformation of the society.

Technology is not wrong per se. It could be both a blessing and a curse depending on our perspective. As much as it could be an advantage for the Government or the ruling elite, it could impose changes on the society which could render some unpredictably positive results, too, especially for Muslims. If such fundamental changes are adopted wisely, Muslims could have an advantage in a way that the western ruling elite could not expect.

The first thing that Muslims should be fully aware of is the fact that the western capitalist machine or the western communist political system does not need us any more. A century ago, or even half a century ago, when the western economy was growing massively, immigrants had something to offer – the economic production machine needed them. Finding a job was not a problem. Immigrants were almost indispensable in the construction industry, cleaning and maintenance service industry, as well as caregiving for both children and elderly.

Thus, for someone leaving his or her own home country and immigrating to the West was reasonable. It was a way to make money and even invest back home. Workers were needed, and the western governments welcomed them. Moving to the USA or Germany, for example, finding a job, contributing to the American or German economy and to their societies, paying taxes, and gradually being an integral part of such countries because the West needed workers and professionals, this was a rational. Again, immigrants could earn their rights as dignified citizens in the western countries because the economy needed them.

With the advent of AI and the advancement in technology in general, immigrants are no longer needed. For a Muslim to abandon hir or her homeland, where he or she is born, has a place, has a reputation, the family and relatives, knows the language and is an organic part of the culture, and to decide to immigrate to another country for economic purposes when his or her professional or labor skills are not demanded or not needed by the market is completely unreasonable, unwise, and foolish.

If one cannot find a job in Albania, Pakistan, Turkey, Iraq, Somalia, Morocco, Egypt or any other Muslim country, where he or she is born and is part of that society, the possibility of finding a job in the USA, Canada, the UK, or any other western country for that matter, is very, very low. Currently, the West has a high number of de facto unemployment. A good portion of the working population or labor force work on minimum wage jobs, barely making ends meet, while potentially they are replaceable by technology.

In fact, the effects of the artificial intelligence and technology are already taking place in the economy, which account for the bulk of the unemployment in the West.

While in the past immigrants could even have some advantages in certain industries as they were willing to work harder and at a lower wage, now things have changed. On the contrary, the falling apart western societies are ready to blame immigrants even for things which are not their fault, such as the rise of unemployment and the unaffordable living.

At the same time, the fact that immigrants are not needed, this will be also reflected on governmental policies and political agendas. While in the past, the western governments might have accommodated immigrants better, including their beliefs, due to their need for them, now things are not the same. Quite frankly, the major reason why the West still continues to welcome Muslim immigrants is to subvert their faith and belief system, perhaps as part of global agendas of the USA and other western countries against Islam and Muslims.

Therefore, I believe that not only is it not reasonable to immigrate to the West, but it could actually be dangerous. It no longer makes sense for a Muslim to abandon his or her own country, no matter how difficult it is to find a job, and immigrate to the West when he or she could put himself or herself in harm’s way, put his or her faith in jeopardy, especially given the fact that a Muslim immigrant has nothing to offer to the western economy.

On the other hand, for a Muslim to live in his country, especially if he has access to land, which is the case for a large number of the Muslim Ummah, build his life in that place, build strong family and kinship relationships, practice the religion of Islam, work hard to be part of a strong religious community will be the only way to survive in a time when the world is about to change fundamentally.

To conclude, when the future holds many uncertainties, it is only wise not to abandon your own country, your own people and community, family and relatives, no matter how difficult the life might be in terms of the economy or earning a living. The battle of difficulties and uncertainties can be fought better at your own place, living among your people, not in a foreign land, alone, surrounded by foreign people and religious enemies, under despotic and corrupt western governments, in countries which have declared legal and political war on God, family values, on religion, and on the most fundamental truths of life such as gender, marriage, and procreation.

Whereas Muslims’ professional skills and labor are no longer demanded in the West, the western countries, too, have nothing to offer them. Therefore, it is time to be wise and reflect on the big economic changes that the world is going through. If acting wisely, AI and technology could even yield positive results for Muslims as they could be forced to learn their religion and form strong communities in their homeland, something which the West is actively attacking through wars, propaganda, and oppressive economic policies imposed on the governments of Muslim countries in order to force Muslims immigrate to the West, as we say in Albania, to go into the wolf’s mouth.

Being wise and being steadfast in the religion of Islam are indispensable weapons in the upcoming fierce ideological battle between the corrupt western communists who want to rule the world with an iron fist and Muslims as the only people striving to uphold God’s law on Earth – the law of justice, fairness, and dignified freedom.



Sabri Lushi

August 5, 2026

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Opinion

PËRSE NUK DUA TË JEM I PASUR! – NJË TRAJTIM ANALITIK I SISTEMIT EKONOMIK AMERIKANO-BRITANIK

by Kukes Post
written by Kukes Post

PËRSE NUK DUA TË JEM I PASUR! – NJË TRAJTIM ANALITIK I SISTEMIT EKONOMIK AMERIKANO-BRITANIK

Edhe pse në pamje të parë duket sikur titulli ka të bëjë me asketizmin, modestinë, apo me konceptin e vetëpërmbajtjes; në fakt, nuk ka të bëjë me një trajtim moral të kësaj teme. Përkundrazi, dua të ndaj një mendim analitik mbi sistemin ekomomik në vetvete, mbi të metat e tij, dhe mbi pasojat negative tek rinia.

Të gjithë e duam pasurinë. Secili nga ne kërkon t’i plotësojë nevojat, të bëjë një jetë të mirë, të rehatshme, të investojë, e madje të ketë edhe një pozicion të konsiderueshëm në shoqëri. Të gjitha këto janë të ngulitura në ADN-ën tonë. Lakmia për më shumë dhe dëshira për të grumbulluar pasuri janë natyrore, por kjo nuk mjafton në jetën reale për të mbijetuar. Jeta është betejë shumë e vështirë, dhe kjo betejë nuk fitohet me dëshira, me lakmi, apo ëndërra, por me mençuri e me pranim të realitetit – me këmbë në tokë siç e themi në gjuhën e përditshme.

Ekonomia moderne nuk është si ajo e një apo dy shekujve më parë. Në një botë të lirë, kur popullsia ishte shumë më e vogël, kur natyra ishte e pa shfrytëzuar plotësisht, kur shitja e mallit të prodhuar ishte e garantuar në treg, puna e sipërmarrja, sëbashku me një familje të fortë, të garantonin pasuri. Me fjalë të tjera, tregu ishte i lirë, i pakontrolluar nga shteti, paraja kishte vlerë reale, jo thjesht printim të paras fiat (pa vlerë reale në vetvete), kështu që të bëheshe i pasur apo jo varej më shumë nga aftësia personale.

Ekonomia e kohës sonë është krejt ndryshe. Shteti ka kontroll të pa imagjinueshëm e të paperceptueshëm siç duhet nga ne njerëzit e thjeshtë. Dëgjojmë të flitet shumë për aftësi sipërmarrëse apo për investime private, sidomos në vendet perëndimore. Ëndërra e shumicës së të rinjëve amerikanë apo europianë, apo tanimë kudo në botë, është që një ditë të bëhen sipërmarrës, të kenë kompanitë e tyre, të vozisin makina të shtrenjta, e të hyjnë në listën e vogël të një-përqindëshit të miliarderëve.

Ky është përshkrim tepër naiv dhe mashtrues i sistemit ekonomik amerikan, apo i sistemit ekonomik në të gjithë botës pasi amerikano-britanikët e kanë imponuar sistemin e tyre në të gjithë rruzullin tokësor. Që një ditë të bëhesh një sipërmarrës i suksesshëm nuk është asgjë tjetër veçse propagandë shtetërore amerikane ndërkohë që rrugëve të Amerikës janë me miliona ata që kanë ngelur të pastrehë, pa sigurim shëndetësor (nuk mund të trajtohen e shërohen në spital), pa familje, dhe enden si qenë endacakë duke pritur vdekjen.

Koncepti i sipërmarrjes ekonomike është koncept amerikan që mashtron rininë, e që e pengon atë për të kuptuar ekonominë reale amerikane apo globale. Të jep përshtypjen sikur sistemi ekonomik favorizon punën e individit, dëshirat, ëndërrat, dhe aftësitë investuese. Realiteti është krejtësisht ndryshe.

Si modeli ekonomiko-politik simbol i ekonomisë moderne, Amerika reale, ndryshe nga Amerika e propagandës apo ajo që dëgjojmë në lajme e filma, është Amerika e kontrollit të madh. Ekonomia amerikane është plotësisht e kontrolluar nga Qeveria ashtu siç ishte e kontrolluar ekonomia e planifikuar socialiste në Shqipëri gjatë kohës së Enver Hoxhës, porse e paraqitur me një ambalazh apo paketim të ndryshëm.

Qeveria amerikane ka monopolin e printimit të dollarit, kontrollon tokën, bën ligjet sipas nevojës së elitës drejtuese, ka të drejtën të taksojë çdo biznes apo transaksion fitimprurës, gëzon të drejtën të ndalojë me ligj çdo biznes apo transaksion fitimprurës, madje përfshirë edhe ato jofitimprurëse, siç janë donacionet, ashtu sikurse gëzon të drejtën të implementojë politike fiskale në interes të elitës drejtuese. Dhe mbas gjithë kësaj, Amerika flet për liri sipërmarrëse.

Të jesh i zoti, punëtor i fortë, e me aftësi të spikatura nuk të garantojnë aspak sukses në Amerikë sepse ekonomia është rreptësisht e kontrolluar. Edhe pse në pamje të parë ndryshon me ekonominë tipike socialite, korporatat nuk janë asgjë tjetër veçse entitete ekonomike të ngjashme me ndërmarrjet ekonomike shtetërore të kohës së socializmit në Bashkimin Soviet apo të Republikës Popullore Socialiste të Shqipërisë.

Korporatat nuk janë entitete ekonomike të ngritura nga individë të thjeshtë, por të ngritura nga dora e shtetit. Ato janë vetë shteti, të kontrolluara nga shteti, të monitoruara nga shteti, që operojnë me lejen e shtetit, që taksohen nga shteti, e favorizohen nga shteti, dhe shteti nuk është një koncept abstrakt siç mashtrojnë e gënjejnë amerikano-britanikët, por një grup individësh – ajo që njihet si elita drejtuese.

Kjo që kërkoj të shpreh nuk ka për qëllim as të dekurajojë rininë e as për të kritikuar sistemin ekonomik amerikano-britanik sepse shumë elementë kanë të bëjnë me natyrën e ekonomisë moderne, me teknologjinë, me natyrën e industrisë së rëndë, apo me shtimin e popullsisë (që kërkon kontroll e disiplinë shtetërore), por dua të vë në dukje realitetin ashtu siç është në mënyrë që njerëzit ta ndryshojnë qasjen e tyre ndaj sistemit politik e ndaj ekonomisë.

Me fjalë të tjera, të gjithë kemi dëshirë të bëhemi të pasur e të bëjmë një jetë luksoze, e ndoshta ta kthejmë aftësinë sipërmarrëse në pjesë të historisë sonë të suksesit, por kjo varet nga realiteti politik dhe nga natyra e vërtetë e sistemit ekonomik.

Thënë shkurt, ëndërra që të bëhesh i pasur është larg realitetit ekonomik. Mund të jesh punëtor i zoti e të kesh aftësi sipërmarrëse, por kjo nuk do të thotë asgjë. Përpara dy shekujsh nëse ishe i fortë fizikisht, kjo të garantonte pasuri sepse tregu ishte i lirë dhe shitja e mallrave ishte e garantuar. Kur ekonomia ishte e thjeshtë e me teknologji jo të sofistikuar, forca dhe aftësia sipërmarrëse bënin diferencën. Pra, pasuria varej shumë nga aftësia e vetë njeriut se sa nga rregullat e tregut.

Në ekonominë moderne, pra tipikisht atë amerikane, që aftësia sipërmarrëse të garanton sukses është mashtrim i pastër. Në fakt, kjo e bën Amerikën shumë më të rrezikshme se sistemet e deklaruara komuniste, siç ishte Bashkimi Soviet, për shembull.

Dikush mund të argumentojë se ka plotë shembuj në Amerikë që e kanë nisur biznesin thuajse duke qenë të pastrehë, dhe kanë përfundur në milionerë. Sigurisht që Amerike e ka shumë të zhvilluar tregun e propagandës. Qeveria amerikane kërkon ta mashtrojë rininë amerikane, dhe rininë kudo në botë, me raste e shembuj të thurura bukur nga industria e propagandës, por nuk flet konceptualisht për modelin.

Nuk mjafton një apo dy shembuj për të vërtetuar një model ekonomik ndërkohë që shembujt që e hedhin poshtë atë janë shumë më mëdha në numër.

Për ta mbyllur, ekonomia moderne është e kontrolluar rreptësisht nga shteti, qoftë me mekanizma formalë e ligjorë, e qoftë përmes dorës së padukshme shtetërore të elitës drejtuese. Sigurisht që mund të jetë e shpjegueshme se pse ekonomia është kaq e kontrolluar nga shteti. Rritja e popullsisë mund të jetë një arsye, apo natyra e industrisë së rëndë që nuk mund të zhvillohet nga sipërmarrës të thjeshtë, por nuk është ky diskutimi.

Konkluzioni është ky: ekonomia moderne i ka opsionet e limituara për të përmbushur ëndërrat e individit për t’u bërë i pasur apo sipërmarrës i suksesshëm. Ky nuk është faji domosdoshmërisht i Amerikës apo i Perandorisë Britanike. Është natyra e ekonomisë moderne që i ka mundësitë e limituara. Pra, një qytetar mesatar i klasës së mese, ku bëjmë pjesë ne të gjithë, i ka mundësitë shumë të limituara për t’u bërë i pasur pavarësisht endërrave që kemi apo embiciet që zhvillojmë për shkak të propagandës perëndimore, dhe ky është faji i Amerikës – gënjen e mashtron rininë me shembuj përjashtues të qendisura nga dora e regjimit shtetëror, me propagandë filmash, e me ideologji politike helmuese të përhapur nga politika amerikane se aftësitë sipërmarrëse janë garanci suksesi.

Suksesi i vërtetë qëndron në pranimin e realitetit. Është e vërtetë që ka njerëz të pasur, ka individë që i ka kapur lapsi i padukshëm i regjimit politik për t’i promovuar, ka njerëz që sillen si të pasur ndërkohë që janë aktorë që fshehin investitorët e vërtetë të elitës drejtuese. Secili nga këta individë mund të bëjë një jetë të mirë ndoshta, por nuk janë aty se janë atë të aftë e sipërmarrës, porse ata i ka kapur lapsi, ndoshta i rastësisë e ndoshta se ata kanë ca cilësi që i hyjnë në punë makinerisë ekonomike mashtruese, siç është makineria ekonomike mashtruese amerikano-britanike.

Njeriu mund të bëhet i pasur, por jo duke besuar përrallat mashtruese amerikane e ato britanike, por duke jetuar një jetë pa ëndërra boshe, me një standard brenda mundësive, duke ulur shpenzimet, duke jetuar një jetë jo sipas stilit të imponuar nga mashtrimi politik shtetëror, por ashtu siç i përshtatet nevojave të individit.

Njeriu duhet të ketë ëndërra e ambicie të mëdha. Këtë gjë e promovon edhe feja islame shumë. Muslimani nuk duhet ta çojë jetën dëm, por, ndryshe nga Amerika mashtruese, feja islame na nxit që të bëhemi të mençur, të jemi të kënaqur me aq sa na ka dhënë Allahu, e ta kërkojmë pasurinë vetëm në ato rrugë që i ka lejuar feja, dhe kjo e fundit ka shumë rëndësi për të jetuar një jetë të mirë. Feja islame nuk i garanton robit pasuri me patjetër, por lumturi. Njeriu mund të jetojë i lumtur me aq pasuri sa ka. Njeriu mund të jetojë i lumtur duke mos i bërë padrejtësi të tjerëve, duke i ushqyer fëmijët me pasuri të lejuar, duke jetuar një stil jete aq sa mund ta përballojë, e jo duke imituar mashtrimet politike shtetërore.

Stili amerikan është stili i mashtrimit, ndërsa feja të mëson të hapësh sytë. Unë nuk dua të jem i pasur. Atë pasuri që e ka shkruajtur Zoti, ajo do të vijë me patjetër, por me kusht që të kërkohet me rrugë të lejuara sipas fesë. Feja garanton lumturi; pasuria është në dorë të Allahut. Ai i jep kujt të dojë dhe ia pakëson atij që do ndërsa Amerika mashtron, gënjenë, dhe shkatërron jetë njerëzisht duke e helmuar rininë me ideologji boshe se aftësitë e tyre sipërmarrëse garantojnë suksese në sistemin ekonomik amerikano-britanik ndërkohë që shteti ka kontroll absolut mbi ekonominë.



Sabri Lushi

Gusht 2026

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
EnglishOpinion

IMMIGRATION TO THE WEST AND THE EVIL AGENDAS OF THE AMERICAN-BRITISH GLOBAL GOVERNMENT

by Kukes Post
written by Kukes Post

IMMIGRATION TO THE WEST AND THE EVIL AGENDAS OF THE AMERICAN-BRITISH GLOBAL GOVERNMENT

As I’ve tried to point out in some of my previous postings, we do not exactly know what America is, I mean, its true mission. All we know about it comes from its massive propaganda and based on notions and concepts that America itself has imposed on us. We are currently living within the American box on a global scale, if we may call it so. However, without knowing the true nature of the political system of America, it is hard to understand many issues that the world is facing currently.

It is an undisputed fact that what the American Republic has achieved in terms of political and economic control over the world’s population at the behest of the British Empire or the British Royal Family is unique and unparalleled; no other empire before has held so much control. America embodies the highest form of human oppression and dictatorship.

In 1776, the world witnessed the formation of a new political entity, which never existed before. For the first time in human history, the political power was disguised, and by necessity, this came with a whole package of new political terms and vocabulary.

The power no longer belonged to the British King, but it was transformed to abstract entities instead, such as the people, the office of the president, or other abstract institutions. By establishing the communist republic of the USA in 1776, the British Monarchy laid the foundations of an evil political model in order to rule the world. From this perspective, we have to admit that the British Empire has been very successful.

In my view, one of the functions of the US Communist Republic was to serve as a slavery confinement; in other words, to do the dirty work of the British Empire, hence the need to disguise the political power of the USA. There is no other case in the recorded human history to have a place whose residents are from all over the world – a mix of vulnerable individuals who have left behind their tribes and families.

While millions upon millions of people were captured as slaves and shipped to America, millions of others have ended up in this communist republic because of the American propaganda in combination with the American spies in every country encouraging people to immigrate.

America was not built to bring to the world a new political system or to correct politically what the British Empire was doing wrong. The US Republic was established by the British Royals in order to control the world, wasn’t it?

America has served as an open prison for millions of slaves from Africa and from other places. America has served as a deceptive destination for millions of immigrants over the last two or three centuries. America has waged thousands of wars and military missions at the behest of the British Empire all over the world. Aren’t these manifestations of political control?!

The USA is not an independent country; rather, it is corrupt and immoral political entity bound to spread corruption and destruction to the world; it is an idea; it is a religion which venerates the Devil. It has been designed to destroy lives of people.

Fast forward to current political situation, America is doing exactly what it has done from the very first day it was established by the British Royals: deceiving the world. When the Artificial Intelligence and the advancement in technology are transforming fundamentally the modern economic system, by rendering the role of people in all sectors of the economy as redundant (useless), very deceptively the USA is inciting and forcing immigration through wars, economic crises, propaganda, and espionage missions on the ground.

To frame it better, when people will lose jobs and their access to the economy due to the AI and technology, they will have no choice but to return to the traditional lifestyle, growing food in remote areas and raising livestock out of necessity. However, this is an undesirable effect. The whole point of the AI and hi-tech is to control people, not to give them a reason to go off-grid.

Here comes the role of America: to deceive people, to incite immigration, especially from Muslim countries to North America. Even though we hear the US President and other American, Canadian, and European politicians expressing high concerns about immigration, everything is a game and a deception. In reality, they are behind all this massive immigration.

Those who are abandoning their villages in Pakistan, Tajikistan, Columbia, Bosnia, Turkey, or any other Muslim country and moving to the West, for the most part undocumented, they are doing so due to the American propaganda and due to local hostile policies, again imposed by the USA, not to mention the American unprovoked wars and immoral economic crises.

In conclusion, America is doing what it knows best to do: deceive. The USA is not a country, but a political entity – a combination of military, political, and intelligence establishment, designed to serve the British Empire in order to control the world, do its dirty work, and destroy lives of people. This is exactly what the US Communist Republic is doing again by inciting immigration through unprovoked wars, espionage missions on the ground, propaganda, and by applying egregious and scandalous policies through its spy governments in Muslim countries.

In my view, the best way to mitigate the damage that the USA is causing in Muslim countries, by inciting immigration and homeland abandonment, is by exposing this corrupt political entity and by pointing out to people that America lies, America deceives, and America backstabs.

America is not against immigration, or foreign aliens as they call illegal immigrants, but it throws the stone and hides the hand. The USA, Canada, and the western Europe in general are part of the American-British evil agenda to cleanse Muslim countries from people who are living a traditional lifestyle or who own land and force them to come to the West – in a place where there is no future and whose economy is replacing humans by robots, technology, and the AI.



Sabri Lushi

August 6, 2026

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
USA

ZOHRAN MAMDANI AND ABDUL EL-SAYED ARE TRYING TO WHITEWASH AMERICA’S BLOODY STAINS

by Kukes Post
written by Kukes Post

ZOHRAN MAMDANI AND ABDUL EL-SAYED ARE TRYING TO WHITEWASH AMERICA’S BLOODY STAINS

Two Muslim Americans that have been promoted recently by the US politics are the mayor of the city of New York, Zohran Mamdani, and Abdulrahman (Abdul) Mohamed El-Sayed, who is the Democratic nominee in the 2026 United States Senate election in Michigan. The media and the American politics have dedicated much attention to these two individuals, some presenting them as two Muslims taking over the American politics, others as progressive young politicians on the rise, or even those attacking them as extremist Islamists and jihadists. This last one is definitely the most interesting one.

Mamdani and El-Sayed are two privileged American citizens who happened to be of a Muslim background, which has no significance in terms of their public political views. They are two Americans who are serving America, no more, no less, without going into more detail of how much they practice Islam or whether they even uphold the most basic Islam’s tenets, such as the five daily prayers, let alone presenting them as some extremist Muslims. Nevertheless, the point is not to throw doubts on their religiosity, but to emphasize the fact that they are not the type of Muslims actively promoting the infallibly of the religion of Islam as opposed to particularly the corrupt British Secularism which is destroying the world.

They are two secularists who are serving America. In fact, when asked about the political situation of some other countries, they’ve declared that they believe the American model of democracy should be replicated around the world. They are mercenaries and servants of America, not Islam.

The reason why these two individuals are being promoted by the US politics has to do with the deteriorated image of the USA, especially in the Muslim world. As we are all aware of, the US Government is covered with the blood of Muslim children and innocent women. From thousands of innocent Muslims killed and murdered in Gaza over the last three years, the destruction of Iraq which has resulted in the death and murder of thousands, if not millions, of innocent Muslims, to other unprovoked wars and monstrous genocides, such as in Somalia, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Sudan, Yemen, and Bosnia.

The harm and destruction that America has inflicted upon Muslims and the reputational damage on the religion of Islam itself is incomparable to any other previous enemy, including the Mongol bloody invasion in the 13th century. America is by far the most vicious enemy, and it currently poses the biggest threat to the Muslim Ummah. Even now as I am writing this posting, the American terrorist military is active in the Middle East inciting conflicts and destabilization.

Therefore, Zohran Mamdani and Abdul El-Sayed are merely trying to whitewash the bloody stains of America; they are not trying to help Muslims, represent them, or genuinely speak on their behalf. Without trying to insult them, they are stooges of the American politics trying to restore the damaged reputation of the most immoral, corrupt, and genocidal regime of human history, i.e., the Communist Republic of United States of America founded by the British Royals in 1776.

However, Muslims are not that foolish. They will never forget the crimes of the American Military and the genocides of the US Government committed against Muslims. America is the biggest enemy of Islam and Muslims, and it will remain such even if the whole American senate is replaced by nominal Muslims.

Muslims are fully aware of the immorality and the deception of the American politics and the corruption of the US Constitution as the first communist manifest to serve as a political treaty. Muslims are disgusted by the American lies, deception, and its propaganda. The smile of Mamdani and the eagerness of El-Sayed cannot fool Muslims any more about America whose mission is to destroy the world and to serve the Devil himself.



Sabri Lushi

August 6, 2026

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Islam

SHTETI MODERN DHE SFIDAT E MËDHA TË KLERIKËVE

by Kukes Post
written by Kukes Post

SHTETI MODERN DHE SFIDAT E MËDHA TË KLERIKËVE

Një pjesë e madhe e aktivitetit të shoqërisë njerëzore që nga ditët e hershme të ezistencës së njeriut e deri më sot nuk ka të bëjë vetëm me zhvillimin e planetit tokë; përkundrazi, njeriu ka harxhuar energji të madhe se si ta kontrollojë njeriun, si ta nënshtrojë atë, dhe se si t’i kontrollojë burimet natyrore. Skllavërimi dhe kontrolli janë elementët më të spikatur të civilizimit njerëzor.

Ky është edhe preokupimi i politikës apo shtetit modern: si ta kontrollojë njeriun. Revolucioni industrial, zhvillimet teknologjike, apo qoftë edhe shpikja e inteligjencës artificiale kanë ardhur si pasojë primare e dëshirës për të kontrolluar, e jo për t’ia lehtësuar jetën njeriut.

Sa i përket kontrollit, synimi i politikës është që ta kontrollojë psikologjinë e njeriut, ideologjinë e tij, mendjen, shpirtin, dhe botëkuptimin e tij. Kontrolli me patrulla policie, me kamxhik, apo duke përdorur forcën në përgjithësi nuk janë metoda të preferuara të pushtetit sepse në çdo moment ato mund të shkakëtojnë reaksion të padëshirur – njerëzit mund të kundërpëgjigjen në masë dhe ta refuzojnë pushtetit me çdo çmim, pra te rebelohen ideologjikisht.

Pikërisht, këtu del në pah roli i dijetarëve, i mendimtarëve kritikë, dhe i klerikëve sepse këta kanë askes tek mendja dhe shpirti i njeriut. Fjala e një dijtari të shquar apo e një imami të mençur mund ta zhbëjë politikën e mbrapshtë të elitës drejtuese për të cilët janë harxhuar vite të tëra. Dijetarët kanë në dorë që t’ua hapin sytë njerëzve, t’i udhëzojnë ata për tek e drejta, dhe t’i nxisin që të mendojnë.

Me fjalë të tjera, klerikët fetarë kanë një rol shumë të rëndësishëm në shoqëri. Për pushtetin, përdorimi i klerikëve për të kontrolluar njerëzit është më i rëndësishëm se puna e policisë apo ndoshta e institucioneve të tjera shtetërore që kanë të bëjnë me kontrollin e njeriut.

Kështu që, shteti modern i cili gëzon kontroll të madh mbi burimet natyrore, ekonominë, sistemin arsimor, ligjbërjen, mediat, policinë, ushtrinë etj., nuk mund ta tolerojë modelin e klerikut të pavarur. Vetë sistemi politik modern amerikano-britanik është ngritur mbi konceptin e kontrollit absolut të njeriut apo të shoqërisë njerëzore. Kjo e bën rolin e klerikut tepër sfidues.

Nga ana tjetër, klerikët dhe dijetarët e kanë për obligim fetar që ta kumtojnë të vërtetën tek njerëzit, t’i thirrin ata për tek Zoti, tek e vërteta, tek drejtësia të cilën Allahu e ka urdhëruar, tek drita e Kur’anit, tek çlirimi i njërëzve nga zgjedha e njeriut zullumqar, dhe duhet ta kryejë këtë mision me besnikëri, me sinqeritet, për hir të Zotit, jo për famë, për shpërblim material, apo si karrierë për të siguaruar bukën e gojës.

Megjithatë, dijetari apo imami është njeri, ka nevoja jetese ashtu siç kanë njerëzit e tjerë. Atij i duhet strehim, i duhet të paguaj faturat, dhe të sigurojë ushqim për veten e tij e për familjen e tij. Mirëpo, shteti modern gëzon kontroll shumë të madh ekonomik. Shteti i modelit sekularist amerikano-britanik, pra i modelit politik që aplikohet kudo në botë, kontrollon vendet e punës, bizneset, taksat, e deri tek klientela – gjë që e bën përmes spiunëve e agjentëve shtetërorë.

Nëse dijetari apo imami flet atë të vërtetë që sistemi politik nuk e dëshrion, dhe nuk janë të pakta ato të vërteta që shteti modern nuk i dëshiron, shteti ka mekanizma të shumta në dorë për ta goditur hoxhën apo dijetarin i cili flet të vërtetën. Shteti ka në dorë vendin e punës, presionin politik, shantazhin juridik, persekutimin shtetëror, taksat, spiunët, apo qoftë edhe vrasjen e karakterin të individit.

Në të shkurarën, kur ekonomia ishte më e decentralizuar, bujqësia dhe ekonomia familjare përbënte pjesën më të madhe të ekonomisë në tërësi, paraja ishte e decentralizuar e jashtë kontrollit absolut të shtetit, dhe njerëzit ishin të organizuar në fise e familje të forta, klerikët fetarë e kishin më të lehtë për ta thënë të vërtetën sepse shteti nuk mund t’iu kërcënonte bukën e gojës. Nën hyqmin e shtetit modern të modelit amerikano-britanik, shteti të kërcënon bukën e gojës sapo të guxojë një dijetar të flasë të vërtetën e hidhur, dhe një gjë të tilë e ka në dorë.

Në këtë aspekt, feja islame ka ligjëruar apo ngritur mekanizma për financimin e dijetarëve apo hoxhallarëve, si për shembull, vakëfi, donacionet e besimtarëve të thjeshtë, koncepti i familjes së fortë, dhe inkurajimi i solidaritetit komunitar. Muslimanët e kanë për detyrë të sillen si një trup i vetëm sa i përket solidaritetit, e jo më kur vjen puna tek dijetarët apo hoxhallarët e komunitetit.

Për ta mbyllur, dijetarët dhe klerikët në tërësi janë trashëgrimtarë të profetëve të Allahut. Ata thirrin për tek rruga e drejtë, ngrenë zërin kundër padrejtësisë, kritikojnë shoqërinë kur ajo fillon të prishet, dhe mbi të gjitha, ata i thërrasin njerëzit që t’i binden Zotit. Motoja e tyre është si ajo e profetëve: “nuk duam shpërblim nga ju; ne shpërblimin e kemi tek Allahut.”

Natyrisht që ky mision shpesh bie në kundershtim me objektivat e mbrapshta të politikës, prishen interesa, dhe cënohen përfitime. E vërteta fetare dhe politika njerëzore janë në përplasje të vazhdueshme.Për këtë arsye, thirrja e profetëve të Allahut (paqja qoftë mbi ta), e për zgjatim edhe ajo e dijetarëve apo e hoxhallarëve, përballet me reaksion, me pengesa, persekutime, shtypje, dhe rezistenë të elitës drejtuese politike për ta shfrytëzuar njeriun. Pra, sfidat që hasin klerikët nuk është diçka e re, por, për shkak të sistemit ekonomik të shtetit modern të modelit komunist amerikano-britanik, mbijetesa e pavarur e njeriut është bërë shumë e vështirë. Ekonomia është në dorë të shtetit. Kjo e bën punën e një imami apo hoxhe tmerrësisht të vështirë sepse shteti, përveç se mund të të burgosë, persekutojë, apo shantazhojë, ai si fillim të ndalon bukën e gojës.

Anembanë botës islame, përveç faktit që me mijëra dijetarë janë burgosur nga shteti modern si pasojë e politikave globale amerikano-britanike për të mbajtur një kontroll absolut mbi shoqërinë njerëzore, me mijëra hoxhallarë e dijetarë janë vrarë si pasojë e luftërave amerikano-britanike të vazhdueshme në tokat muslimane, ndërkohë që sfida me të cilën të gjithë dijetarët e hoxhallarët e kohës sonë po përballen janë sfidat ekonomike.

Pa një burim ekonomik të pavarur nga kontrolli shtetëror, dijetari apo hoxha e ka shumë të vështirë për të thënë të vërtetën e për të qenë i besueshëm në misionin e tij. Ky është problemi që duhet të trajtohet strategjikisht nga intelektualët e ummetit, të ngrihet vetëdija, dhe të edukohen masat sepse jetojmë nën një sistem politik global amerikano-britanik kontrolli diktatorial i të cilit nuk ka ekzistuar më parë për shkak të ekonomisë moderne që kontrollohet totalisht nga shteti.



Sabri Lushi

Gusht, 2026

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts